Sunday, June 12, 2011

mpaa rating screen

images MPAA Rating: PG-13 mpaa rating screen. MPAA Ratings Kerfuffle
  • MPAA Ratings Kerfuffle


  • kgwithnogc
    05-08 01:48 PM
    One of China'a growth/export strategy is (and was) always to attract Chineese enterprenuers who settled in the west, so that they can bring technology and market(links).
    Now they want all the other chineese to come back, as it is more of country's requirement of quality work force of their own, it seems.
    US will loose the edge slowly, if they don't act quickly in not only in retaining talented immigrants and need to do "lot" other things.

    That is why it is called "Mother Land".

    But in this story it looks like the locals are a little bit suspicious of returnees.

    "Starting a company isn't an option for most of the 20-something haigui. Some end up unemployed and are known as haidai, "seaweed"." :(




    wallpaper MPAA Ratings Kerfuffle mpaa rating screen. about mpaa ratings looking
  • about mpaa ratings looking


  • pcs
    08-01 09:31 AM
    bump




    mpaa rating screen. MPAA Rating: Not Available
  • MPAA Rating: Not Available


  • same_old_guy
    08-16 03:11 PM
    1) The company has to send a letter to USCIS to withdraw the I-129.
    2) It can withdraw at any time before or after approval. In fact it wont matter to you if you never work for the company.
    3) If USCIS rejects it, as in not selected in lottery, you will get back USCIS fee. If you withdraw it there is no refund. In any case, you dont get back lawyer's fee.
    4) Withdraw can be done anytime.
    5) No form. The company has to send a letter in letterhead stating the receipt number, asking to revoke the application.
    6) I dont think USCIS sends any confirmation if H1 is revoked by employer. In any case of H1, you dont have to worry so much. It's all responsibility of the company. It's perfectly valid to have more than 1 H1 at any time.




    2011 about mpaa ratings looking mpaa rating screen. MPAA Rating: R (for brutal
  • MPAA Rating: R (for brutal


  • immi2006
    10-21 11:40 PM
    I do not think so, even though you have two application , there will be only 1 A# for each applicant.

    We got only 1 FP notice for each of us. Our case is slightly different. I filed for myself and my wife. My wife filed for herself.

    We did not apply for EAD and AP, through my wife. I applied from my side for both of us.



    OK, everyone knows that double I485 was not a good idea. However, many people had done it and I was one who was thinking of it, but did not do it. As per my attorney's advise, stopping a check issued to a governmental entity is not legal. On these grounds, I decided not to file 2nd time.

    I guess the best way would be to withdraw the second petition. One can do that by writing a letter stating the reason for withdrawal and sending it to the appropriate service center (with tracking number.) Of course, the reason should be true, "Due to the July Visa Bulletin fiasco and indications that my first I485 could have been lost, I sent out a second application which is should not be considered anymore," or something like that. Withdrawal of the second I485 would, most likely, be the safest way to go about it.

    Regards,



    more...

    mpaa rating screen. Options such as film rating
  • Options such as film rating


  • grupak
    03-01 12:50 PM
    ^^^^




    mpaa rating screen. MPAA Rating: Not Rated
  • MPAA Rating: Not Rated


  • sundarraj61
    11-04 10:39 PM
    I too missed the chance ( formy wife and son) and waiting for the next chance and not sure when it is going to happen.

    -sundar

    Situation - During the month of July, I filed my 485 when all categories were current. Got my receipt too. Missed wife's application because her papers were not ready. Now priority dates have retrogressed again.

    Saving grace - Our H1/H4 are in order with many long years left on them.

    Question - Can I file my wife 485 now as a dependent, even though "my" PD is not current yet. The core point is that, does the concept of PD applies to the dependent 485 applications too?



    more...

    mpaa rating screen. MPAA Rating: PG-13
  • MPAA Rating: PG-13


  • forever
    08-03 10:38 PM
    Just curious..how do you get this press release...its not yet up on their site.

    Go to Home page and click on Press Room. You can see updates for Aug, July.




    2010 MPAA Rating: Not Available mpaa rating screen. MPAA Rating: PG-13
  • MPAA Rating: PG-13


  • hmehta
    05-31 11:32 AM
    On the same lines, one of my relative was also denied entry into the US at the Mineapolis airport. She is a widow, 70 years of age, and used to come here to visit her only son and daughter-in-law and their son, since last 6 years. She used to stay for 6 months during the summer time (April to Oct.) and then 6 months in India. But this time when she came here they denied her entry suggesting that you have a pattern of staying here since last 6-7 years at the same time of the year, so you are doing something illegal!!!!......

    Now how can one explain this???....70 years of age, a widow and her only son and daughter-in-law earning together earning atleast 6 figure income, a house of their own.....never went out of status, never extendend her stay beyond 6 months.......doing something illegal? and that too they said that they 'suspect'!....no proof whatsoever.....but according to law, she had to go back....this sucks big big time.



    more...

    mpaa rating screen. MPAA Rating: Not Yet Rated
  • MPAA Rating: Not Yet Rated


  • loveiv
    05-25 10:23 PM
    Most of I-485 applications are currently stuck with the State Department's Visa Bulletin retrogression which are many years behind. However, aside delays which are attributed to the visa number retrogressions, the cases which were filed during the July 2007 Visa Bulletin fiasco period are expected to take nearly three years from the end of the USCIS itsself processing and adjudications in terms of the workloads, according to the CRS report. July 2007 VB fiasco filers, go figure!
    According to the CRS report, the USCIS issues before the Congress are as follows from the perspectives of FY 2009 budget:
    USCIS Issues for Congress. USCIS issues for Congress include the surgein immigration benefit applications that occurred in FY2007 and which resulted in an increase in the agency’s backlog, and the use of the Federal Bureau ofInvestigation’s (FBI’s) National Name Check program to vet immigration benefitapplications.
    Surge in Benefit Applications and Resulting Backlog. According to the testimony of USCIS Director Emilo T. Gonzalez, USCIS experienced an increasein its backlog of naturalization applications in the second half of FY2007.116 From May through July of 2007 USCIS received three and a half times more applications than during the same three months in the previous year.117 Consequently, published accounts indicate that processing time for applications filed during the FY2007 “surge” would be between 16-18 months, as compared to 6-7 months for applications filed in the same period during FY2006.118 For all immigration benefits, the USCIS director testified that the agency received over 1.2 million more applications during the FY2007 surge than in the same period during FY2006, for a total of over 3 million applications. According to media reports, USCIS officials believe that the backlog created by the application surge could take close to three years to clear. Although citizenship campaigns and a contentious national immigration debate have been cited as contributing factors, many observers believe most of the surge in
    applications may be attributed to the USCIS fee increase of July 30, 2007. These fee adjustments followed an internal cost review and they increased application fees by a weighted average of 96% for each benefit. The cost of naturalization, formmigration benefit applications that occurred in FY2007 and which resulted in an increase in the agency’s backlog, and the use of the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s (FBI’s) National Name Check program to vet immigration benefit applications.example, increased from $330 to $595. Critics of this new naturalization backlog have mainly raised concerns that applicants would not naturalize in time toparticipate in the 2008 election. USCIS did not include a request for direct appropriations to hire additional temporary personnel to adjudicate the backlog.
    Use of FBI National Name Check Program. An additional potential issue for Congress concerns USCIS’ use of the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s (FBI) National Name Check Program. USCIS officials have estimated that roughly 44% of 320,000 pending name checks for immigration benefit applications have taken more than six months to process, including applications for legal permanent residence (LPR) and naturalization. As a result, the White House has authorized USCIS to grant approximately 47,000 LPR applicants their immigration benefits without requiring completed FBI name checks. Critics of this decision believe it could expose the United States to more security threats. The USCIS ombudsman, however, has argued that USCIS employment of the FBI name check process is of limited value to public safety or national security because in most cases the applicants are living and working in the United States without restriction.

    Source: www.immigration-law.com

    Three years clock ticks from the day filed, one year is down, two to go.




    hair MPAA Rating: R (for brutal mpaa rating screen. MPAA Rating: R (for bloody
  • MPAA Rating: R (for bloody


  • gcwait2007
    12-06 06:43 PM
    My brother chose to leave USA on his own, after working for 6 years, without applying GC. He was getting 120K here in USA. In India, he joined Oracle Corp and his salary is almost same (about Rs.55Lacs). Indian salaries are becoming excellent these days.



    more...

    mpaa rating screen. MPAA Rating: Not Available
  • MPAA Rating: Not Available


  • cbpds
    02-11 05:06 PM
    I sent via USPS priority which charged 11 bucks, it reached in 7 days.....the back up plan was to reschedule the visa interview dates. The original plan worked and all ends well !!

    my advice (from my experience)..if u do USPS Priority (India postal employee deliver it for sure), and chances r high that u may receive it in OPENED, MISSING, LOST (part of docs) state (we had this multiple times from different locations)

    Strongly suggest NOT to use Priority unless u have had firsthand good experience!

    Using USPS express was little different, fast, and prompt (guess they use some special delivery layer) :mad:




    hot Options such as film rating mpaa rating screen. MPAA Rating: R (for strong
  • MPAA Rating: R (for strong


  • Templarian
    08-25 10:53 PM
    I tried, hes actually pretty hard to make: http://img209.imageshack.us/img209/3691/sonicld1.gif

    Someone else is going to have to do sonic sorry man.



    more...

    house MPAA Rating: PG-13 mpaa rating screen. MPAA Rating: Not Available
  • MPAA Rating: Not Available


  • jsb
    10-25 03:53 PM
    I agree with you....You should be able to file the G28 form to get someone else to be yr representative 2 or 4
    ..

    My understanding is that you need to send a Cancel G-28 notice (as a simple letter, or using a G-28 form) to USCIS. Your current attorney does not have to do anything. You hired your attorney, so you can drop him/her anytime and advise USCIS.




    tattoo MPAA Rating: Not Rated mpaa rating screen. MPAA Rating: PG-13 (for
  • MPAA Rating: PG-13 (for


  • gccovet
    05-16 04:15 PM
    All,

    Did not want to create any sensational news, but this is what I gathered from speaking to an IO. I had applied for my EAD on Jan 25th and havent received any updates. So, I called the NSC customer service and an IO informed me that I need to check back with them in another 60 days if no decision is made by that time. When I said that it would be 6 months by that time, the IO said that "that's right. Each IO has about 500 applications on their desk and it will take some time to clear these off"

    Just wanted to update everyone so that all the June/July filers can file appropriately.

    Again, mine could be an isolated case. So, please dont panic::))

    This is going to get worse as July 07 filers (i am one of them) starts filing renewals.

    Question is: Can a person currently working on EAD continue to work on EAD (renewal request filed) eventhough EAD expires? what would be the status if he/she cannot work?
    GCCovet.



    more...

    pictures MPAA Rating: PG-13 mpaa rating screen. MPAA rating: PG for some mild
  • MPAA rating: PG for some mild


  • apb
    09-11 03:05 PM
    I saw two soft LUDs on Sep/9 and 10th after I opened a SR on Sep/4th.
    Still waiting. Anybody had similar experience?




    dresses MPAA Rating: R (for strong mpaa rating screen. MPAA Rating: R
  • MPAA Rating: R


  • gparr
    July 26th, 2005, 04:20 PM
    Well, you got me started on something new Gary.... Since I don't shoot in raw format, I have never processed RAW before in photoshop, so I had to first download the most recent version of the raw plug-in.... and what fun! But since I have never played with it before, I'm still experimenting. Thanks! You've opened up a whole new world for me! :)

    Always glad to help you expand your horizons, Queen. Anxious to see your version of my image.
    Gary



    more...

    makeup MPAA Rating: Not Yet Rated mpaa rating screen. MPAA Rating: PG-13
  • MPAA Rating: PG-13


  • ita
    01-23 08:30 PM
    Suggestions.

    1 Since the main reason behind the retrogression is the lack of Visa numbers I feel it would be a great idea to process the 485 applications , make a decision on the case and let the applicant know about the decision though the actual card can be mailed when the Visa Numbers become available . This would reduce the anxiety on behalf of the applicants and would also give USCIS ample time to process all the applications.

    2. Yearly extension of EAD/AP is getting so expensive especially when one doesn't know how many years we have to keep doing the extensions.
    It's a known fact that except for the July 07 bulletin EB3 India PD has hardly touched year 2002 since Dec 2004.

    Some of the EB3 I folks with a 2005 PD, that I know have been issued one year extension on their EAD though they applied for the extensions in mid July(2008).

    Example of EAD/AP anxiety:

    AP document says that it should be used for emergency travel. This rule on AP
    was formed at a time when 485 processing would take not more than 6 months.
    In the present scenario with 485 processing taking years I think a person using EAD would end up using AP many times . Officers at the POE sometimes remind us the rule that AP should be used only in emergency and some of them give the person hard time if they believe the travel was not for emergency purpose.
    I guess we are supposed to have a proof of emergency travel.

    Though AC21 lets one change jobs 180 days after filing the 485 application with the I40 approved for more than 180 days when reentering the country some of the officer(s) sometimes ask the person if they are still with the same company that filed their GC.I don't know yet what they would do/say if one had changed their jobs because the people who were asked this question did not change their employer at that time. But the fact that they ask us this question makes us apprehensive about changing jobs.
    With so many rules where most of them were formed long back it's making applicant's life increasingly tough as the applicants themselves don't want to do anything that would be construed/fall on the wrong side of the rules.We are forced to watch our steps multiple times even in the case of simple things like job changes,travelout of country etc.

    When I repeatedly read about how USICS is inundated with 485 applications due to July 2007 bulletin I keep wondering why USCIS would want to increase it's work load every year with all these EAD/AP renewal applications.

    Suggestion
    Once upon a time when the 485 processing took like 6 months, EAD/AP had different meaning. In the present scenario when not many of us know how many more yeras it's going to be before (especially EB3 I folks) we get our GreenCard I would think it would be better to use the pending 485 application to change jobs and reenter the country.
    This would save money/time for the applicant and lot of time for USICS.

    Thank you.




    girlfriend MPAA Rating: PG-13 (for mpaa rating screen. MPAA Rating: R
  • MPAA Rating: R


  • missedthecut
    02-09 10:47 PM
    I had the same problem couple of years ago and I live in california. My friend dropped me at the mexico border in san diego. Went to mexico and had my I94 changed till the visa expiration and came back to USA. Its very simple and you should not have any problem as you have valid visa.




    hairstyles MPAA Rating: Not Available mpaa rating screen. MPAA Rating: Not Rated
  • MPAA Rating: Not Rated


  • Refugee_New
    03-24 02:30 PM
    Now everything is queued..... no more cutting lines.

    Thanks for the news vinabath. You know what?

    Indian cricket team won the world cup last night. They beat West Indies.

    Congratulate Kapil, Srikanth, Ravi shastri, Gavaskar, Mohindar Amarnath and other team members.




    roseball
    10-08 06:32 PM
    Company A did my GC. I am with Company B on AC21. When my GC gets approved i should be able to stay with Company B and not A. Am i missing something?

    Your case is different as you are protected by AC21 regulations. You can continue working for company B upon GC approval. The original poster's case is different since he changed employers when his labor was still pending and the only way employer A would have justified continuing processing his case was under the pretext that the beneficiary would join the company upon GC approval. Infact, thats the only reason why USCIS continued to process his petition and eventually approve it.

    Now, if the job no longer exists at the time of GC approval, then it could lead to serious consequences and GC can be revoked anytime by USCIS if they find this out. Remember, its always the responsibility of the beneficiary to provide relevant/sufficient documentation whenever asked for, even after the beneficiary has an approved GC. Such things will come back and haunt you if not taken care of in an appropriate manner (legal consulation).




    njboy
    09-10 10:20 PM
    http://www.uscis.gov/graphics/publicaffairs/USCISToday_Sep_06.pdf

    According to the illustrious director of uscis, Mr Emilio Gonzalez, the backlog reduction centers have made rapid progress. In feb 2004, form i140 took 11 months to clear, but as of july 2006, there are zero, i repeat 0 backlogs. It is awesome that he is focusing on the positive, but I would also like to know is how many hundreds of thousands are waiting for their first stage labor to clear.



    No comments:

    Post a Comment